People give twice as much to beggar in a suit than dressed in jeans, study finds

Smartly dressed people asking for money are likely to receive 2.5 times more than those casually dressed, a new study has found.

Academics from the Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality at the City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate Center conducted an experiment to see if socio-economic status indicators, such as clothing, were likely to have an effect on the compassion shown to them by others.

The experiment was conducted in six busy areas in New York City and Chicago, with a man standing in the street holding a paper cup and a cardboard sign with a message about homelessness.

In the high-status trials, the man was dressed in high-status symbols — a suit, dress shirt, a tie, and slick hair. In the low-status trials, he was dressed in low-status symbols — jeans and a t-shirt.

During the experiment researchers counted the number of passers-by, the number of people who donated their money, and the number of people who engaged with the confederate.

The results revealed that when the confederate was wearing a suit and tie, he received 2.55 times the amount of money he received when he wore jeans.

Read source

donations charity status dress socio-economics

Bibliography

The influence of signs of social class on compassionate responses to people in need

Bennett Callaghan, Quinton M. Delgadillo, Michael W. Kraus
Front. Psychol. | Frontiers Media SA

Funding:

Abstract:
A field experiment (N = 4,536) examined how signs of social class influence compassionate responses to those in need. Pedestrians in two major cities in the United States were exposed to a confederate wearing symbols of relatively high or low social class who was requesting money to help the homeless. Compassionate responding was assessed by measuring the donation amount of the pedestrians walking past the target. Pedestrians gave more than twice (2.55 times) as much money to the confederate wearing higher-class symbols than they did to the one wearing lower-class symbols. A follow-up study (N = 504) exposed participants to images of the target wearing the same higher- or lower-class symbols and examined the antecedents of compassionate responding. Consistent with theorizing, higher-class symbols elicited perceptions of elevated competence, trustworthiness, similarity to the self, and perceived humanity compared to lower-class symbols. These results indicate that visible signs of social class influence judgments of others’ traits and attributes, as well as in decisions to respond compassionately to the needs of those who are suffering.

References

Adams (1963)
Adler (1994)
Anderson (2012)
Aron (1992)
Axelrod (1981)
Bandura (2002)
Bastian (2010)
Batson (1989)
Becker (2017)
Bickman (1971)
Bourdieu (1984)
Buunk (2003)
Case (2015)
Cialdini (1997)
Cohen (1994)
Cuddy (2008)
Cuddy (2002)
Darley (1973)
DeCelles (2016)
Ekman (1992)
Faul (2007)
Festinger (1954)
Fisher (1922)
Fiske (2009)
Frank (1988)
Gaertner (1971)
Gilbert (2017)
Giles (1983)
Goetz (2010)
Goff (2013)
Goodman (1993)
Gregory (1996)
Hamilton (1964)
Harris (2006)
Harris (2009)
Henrich (2004)
Kraus (2013)
Kraus (2014)
Kraus (2009)
Kraus (2013)
Kraus (2019)
Krebs (1993)
Labov (2006)
Landis (1977)
Laughnan (2014)
Major (2005)
Martinez (2011)
Mascaro (2020)
Nishi (2015)
Nussbaum (1996)
Oveis (2010)
Pandey (1979)
Piketty (2014)
Richard (2003)
Rivera (2016)
Sands (2017)
Sapolsky (2004)
Solomon (1977)
Spencer (2005)
Sugiyama (2003)
Tracy (2018)
Trivers (1971)
Tyler (2012)
Van Doesum (2017)
Wilkinson (2009)
Zeil (2001)
Zimmerman (1994)